Guideline on Copyright, Citation, and Plagiarism

 PART 1: RATING DOCUMENTATION OF SOURCES

1)         F     I rated this passage F because although the documentation looks correct, the source is used out of context or contrary to the meaning in the original text.

2)         D    This passage has documentation, but it is not used clearly or correctly. The sentence about George Washington should either be cited (clearly from a different source). Also, in the Works Cited section, “Civilization 3” should be italicized.

3)         B     Was the Notes on the State of Virginia a separate reference in the Works Cited section? If so, it is missing information to set it apart as such. The first sentence of this passage needs a citation, but it did not come from the Ellis paragraph, which means yet another source on the Works Cited section.  Ellis was noted in the Works Cited but not cited in-text.  I could also have gone with a C rating on this one.

4)          A     A few words may have been changed here or there in this passage, but sentence structure was not changed. There was some phrasing copied verbatim—with no in-text citations of any kind, nor sources cited in a Works Cited section.

5)         H     I think the writer of this passage cited sources and paraphrased well while still implementing personal thoughts and ideas about the topic.


PART 2: REFLECTION ON “SELF PLAGIARISM”

              When I first came back to school and learned that “self-plagiarism” is an actual problem, I was surprised. It seemed extremely strange that I would not be able to use my own words from previous works without citing myself. It still feels odd to even type such a concept. However, as I have learned about ethics in publication, I have come to understand the importance of not self-plagiarizing. Just from a practical student standpoint, when researching a specific topic, I would find it extremely frustrating to find multiple resources by the same author(s) containing the same information or variations of the same study while claiming that each is an original work. Publishing just for the sake of getting published does not build upon research. Similarly, piecing out information into multiple journal articles in order to publish more weakens the research.

              Things get “muddy” when repurposing one’s own phrases or statements that do not necessarily apply specifically to one study or research project. Perhaps such a statement would be applicable in multiple disciplines or under differing circumstances. Coming up with a new way to say the same thing might be very challenging and feel quite unnecessary, especially when doing so does not change the integrity of the research. Happily, properly citing all sources will allow the writer to avoid plagiarism of any kind.

Comments

  1. SamDecember 2, 2020 at 3:31 PM

    Hi Robin, thank you for your thoughtful comments on self-plagiarism and for explaining your ratings. I'm glad you noticed the problem with the cherry-picked quotations in the first example. I actually think #2 does the best job of paraphrasing the source and incorporating it into a new argument, citation issues aside.--Sam

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reflections on Kuhlthau Article

     Since returning to school after thirty years, searching for information has been both the foundation and bane of my existence. Most of my classes have required research in one form or another, typically culminating in a final project or paper. In general, I love the idea of research and I fully understand how important research is in gaining and furthering knowledge. However, in practice, I have experienced great uncertainty and anxiety in the process of seeking information. Long gone are the days when research is limited to the physical resources of a local library. Suddenly, I have access to a whole world of information right at my fingertips. Access to virtually unlimited information sounds like a good thing. But I have found it to be extremely overwhelming. Just coming up with an idea for a research topic can be challenging enough. Sorting through great quantities of information which often seems inconsistent and conflicting can be down right discouraging. Typi...
Read more

Information about Information

PART 1        It is strange how confusing living in the information age can be. Real news, fake news. How is it even possible to tell the difference? This week's instruction was centered on just this dilemma. I was pretty excited to learn that there are some specific techniques that can be used to help determine what is reliable information and what is not. My first assignment was to read a fact-check page from the DigiPro project. The topic that caught my attention was, "When did we begin standing for the national anthem?" I am not certain why I expected this article to simply be a history lesson. I was reminded in the introduction that the tradition of standing for the national anthem has a much more political context in US sports, particularly the NFL. Much of this article was primarily informational in nature, and I found it to be quite interesting. However, most of the embedded links led to a page on the Internet Archive Wayback Machine stating that the URL h...
Read more

The Background Search

 This week, I was asked to respond directly to questions, so I am including them in this post. Part One: Background Information from a Web Search   1.      What is your research topic? This should be a general area of interest at this point. It should NOT be a research question yet. Spanish Flu: The Corona Virus Pandemic is often compared to the 1918 Pandemic often known as the Spanish Flu   2.      Select an unfamiliar Search Engine or Metasearch Engine from the list linked in the lesson and run a search for your topic. DO NOT use Google or Wikipedia for this part of the assignment!   Wait!!! There are other ways to search for information???   a.        Tell me which search engine or metasearch engine you used.     Bing b.        What new ideas or information did you find about the topic?    Just browsing brought up actua...
Read more